Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Palickap

User page Discussion
Active discussions
English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Palickap!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 中文（台灣）‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
  • For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot (talk) 13:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | বাংলা | +/−

Hello, Palickap!
 

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Březolupy, kostel.jpg and otherEdit

Hello Palickap!

First of all, thank you for your contributions!

Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{Own}} as source instead of "Palickap". This is essential for keeping this image on Commons because this shows explicitly that this photograph is your own work.

Thanks in advance for your support. --High Contrast (talk) 08:59, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Košíky, ulice.jpgEdit

català | čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Popisky k obrázkůmEdit

Zdravím, díky za Vaše fotky. Měl bych však malou prosbu, a to, jestli byste nemohl k obrázkům přidávat popisky. To nic neříkající "a" jako třeba tady opravdu nevypadá moc dobře a přidělává to práci ostatním. Díky moc za pochopení. S přáním pěkného dne --Mercy (talk) 21:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Sušice (UH), kříž.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


File:Mistřice, škola.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


File:Bílovice, hasičská zbrojnice.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


File:Přerov, Horní náměstí č.p. 33.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Vlajky z REKOSuEdit

Dobrý den, starší vlajky jsou ve formátu GIF (indexované barvy), prosím dávejte na to pozor při downloadu, je nutné uvést koncovku *.gif. Jinak se někde po cestě soubor zbytečně a chybně konvertuje na JPG, čímž se aplikuje více či méně viditelná komprese – viz např. zde. Díky za pochopení. --Gumruch (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Činíte tak nadále, nerozumíte tomu technicky? Asi Vám prohlížeč přednastavuje název stahovaného souboru symbol.jpeg, ale ve spodní řádce je typ souboru GIF, tedy je nutné přepsat příponu na tuto. Prosím nedělejte práci, kterou budou muset ostatní opravovat. Srovnejte např. Váš a můj soubor (včetně popisu a kategorizace). Děkuji. --Gumruch (talk) 09:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Sokolnice, krávy, detail.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Zbýšov (VY), starý dům.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Copyright status: File:Zbýšov_(VY),_náves.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zbýšov_(VY),_náves.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

High Contrast (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Babice (UH), centrum.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Blatnička, centrum.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Kroměříž, Tovačovského.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Suchov, MŠ.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Liptál, restaurace.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Židova strouha.JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Břestek, pomník.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Lázně Bohdaneč, radnice a kostel.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Hradec Králové, Habrmanova.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Štípa, starý kostel, interiér.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Huštěnovice z dálky.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


File:Skulptury ve vinici mezi Týncem a Tvrdonicemi.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


File:Dolní Bojanovice, fara.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Uherské Hradiště, Masarykovo náměstí.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Odry, náměstí.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Odry, náměstí.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Odry, náměstí.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

GeorgHH • talk   20:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | русский | slovenčina | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | svenska | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Palickap,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
  
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 01:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Cultural monuments in Uherské HradištěEdit

Dobrý den, velmi si vážím vaší usilovné práce pro Wikipedii a zejména pak fotodokumentaci mého rodného koutu Moravy. Píši vám nyní proto, že mám drobný dotaz, a sice ohledně vašich nedávných editací, kterými jste odebral některé mé fotografie uherskohradišťských památek z kategorie Cultural monuments in Uherské Hradiště, ačkoliv jste současně v téže kategorii ponechal např. svou vlastní fotografii téhož objektu. Nevím, zda šlo úmysl či nějaké nedopatření, ale podle mého chápání kategorií typu „Cultural monuments in ...“ vzniklých v souvislosti se soutěží Wiki Loves Monuments je jejich cílem sdružovat všechny fotografie, na kterých se nacházejí kulturní památky. Sama šablona {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2012}} toto bohužel neřeší, protože ta zařadí fotografii pouze do automatické kategorie objektů se známým ID. Jestliže by problémem byl vyšší počet fotografií téhož objektu, navrhuji toto řešit založením samostatné kategorie pro daný objekt; ponechání pouze jediné fotografie objektu v této kategorii je však pro mne nepřípustné. Rád bych vás požádal o vysvětlení, prozatím jsem si troufnul tyto vaše editace revertovat. S přátelským pozdravem Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 01:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Podrobnější kategorieEdit

Ahoj, ohledně Category:Dopravní nostalgie 2009-Náměstí Svobody (Brno)... Myslím si, že spíš by bylo lepší založit kategorii ve smyslu "Transport at náměstí Svobody (Brno)", kam by se hodily všechny věci, které se týkají dopravy na náměstí Svobody. Totéž i u jiných (třeba Category:Moravské náměstí), sám jsem si už říkal, že to asi bude potřeba řešit, aby ktegorie náměstí neobsahovala milion dopravních fotek. :-) --Harold (talk) 12:06, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Ahoj, díky za reakci na moje řazení obrázků. Udělal jsem prozatím jen pokusně pár fotek. Samozřejmě mou hlavní motivací je zpřehlednit některé kategorie brněnských ulic a náměstí, které zahltili fanoušci MHD. (Jinak nic proti nim, je to hezký koníček a fotky mají bezvadné.) Tu kategorii Transport at... mám taky v plánu. Vzhledem k tomu, že převládají fotky z akce v roce 2009, která je taky kategorizována zvlášť, chtěl jsem ty fotky nechat nějak pohromadě a odlišit je od jiných dopravních, vyfocených při jiné příležitosti. Plánoval jsem k nim pak dvě cesty: Transport at... a Events at.. (tam by to bylo společně s koncerty, happeningy...). Uvidíme, bude to asi dost pracné. Prozatím dokončuju rozřazení brněnských památek a kategorie brněnských ulic. Snad to dělám správně a v duchu Wikipedie. S pozdravem Pavel Palička
Ahoj, pro přehlednost, ať je diskuse na jednom místě, jsem si dovolil přesunout Tvůj příspěvek sem.
No, většinou to jsou právě moje fotky, případně od Dezidora. A to ještě plánuju ze svého archivu něco nahrát, až bude čas. :-) Dobře teda, jen bych asi doporučil tu kategoii přejmenovat (=založit novou) na něco jako "Dopravní nostalgie 2009 at náměstí Svobody (Brno)". Ta pomlčka/spojovník je v takovém systému názvů kategorií dost netypická, nevím jestli jsem se s tím někdy tady setkal. --Harold (talk) 22:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Řazení v kategoriíchEdit

Zdravím. Nezdá se mi moc šťastný nápad používat v klíčích pro řazení v kategoriích přepis češtiny do spřežkového pravopisu. To je velmi nestandardní řešení. Ostatně nelíbí se mi v řadicích klíčích ani prosté osekání českých slov o diakritiku. Pokud má být nějak řešeno řazení písmen rozšířených verzí latinky v abecedě, tak by to mělo být řešení systémové, přímo v softwaru - a kdo potom bude dohledávat a opravovat všechny tyhle inovace a náhražky? --ŠJů (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Ahoj,
díky za zájem o moji činnost na Wiki. Moje změny v řazení souborů a kategorii (téměř výhradně se týkají oborů obce ČR a památky ČR) vycházejí z uživatelských zkušeností. Systém wikipedie řadí soubory s diakritikou automaticky až zcela na konec. Pokud tedy hledám např. Újezd nebo Český..., apod., jsou řazeny až za písmenem Z. To je pro českého uživatele zcela nezvyklé a myslím, že i ojedinělý cizojazyčný uživatel by s tím měl problém. Pokud tedy zařadím soubor Černá Hora pod C, zdá se mi to být pro Čecha i cizince přijatelné. (Nejde o spřežky, ale o písmenko z v editaci, které posune soubor na konec souborů začínající stejným písmenkem.) Rozlišení bez diakritiky jsem zprvu taky neuznával a nerozuměl jsem mu, dokud jsem jako uživatel nezjistil, že například Tábor je řazený až za Trutnovem. Myslím, že nejde o nic nesystémového, jen to vyrovnává a zpřehledňuje specifika češtiny (pro cizince i pro Čechy). Proti stovkám zcela nezařazených souborů se mi to zdá být dost užitečné. Přesto jsem ochoten se svých představ ustoupit, pokud to bude ku prospěchu. Znovu to prosím zvaž, případně konzultuj s jinými zasvěcenými. Budu rád za další názory. S pozdravem Palickap — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palickap (talk • contribs) 23:11, 25 February 2013‎ (UTC)
Díky za reakci. Samozřejmě předpokládám, že jsi k tomuto způsobu měl nějaké důvody, které se dají snadno odhadnout. Z krátkodobého hlediska se snad může zdát účelné různými způsoby takto ručně a jednotlivě napravovat a záplatovat nedokonalou činnost softwaru. Ovšem pokud systém necháme řadit tak, jak má abecedu nadefinovanou, tak inteligentní uživatel poměrně brzy tu logiku pochopí a všimne si, v jakém pořadí písmena řadí, zatímco když každý z nás bude zavádět nějaká takováto šidítka (a každý bude vymýšlet jiná) a část názvů bude zase řazena přímo systémem, tak v tom vznikne nepravidelnost, která to pochopení nováčkům ještě ztíží. A pokud se jednou stane, že někdo vnese do softwaru tu drobnou úpravu, aby se "národní" písmena latinky řadila v abecedě nějak normálně (a to doufám, že jednou někoho napadne, a nechápu, proč už se to nestalo dávno), tak v případě používání normálních českých názvů v řadicích klíčích se tato změna projeví naprosto ihned, zatímco tyhlety náhražkové zlepšováky bude poměrně obtížné všechny dohledat a opravit, pokud se vůbec někomu bude chtít, takže tím vlastně ty chyby zbytečně nakonzervuješ na ještě delší dobu.
Jinak samozřejmě díky za tu hromadu práce.
Ještě drobné poznámky:
  • v diskusích se podepisujeme pomocí takové té ikonky nad editačním oknem, obvykle se zobrazuje jako třetí. Díky tomu pak podpis obsahuje i datum a čas příspěvku a odkazy na osobní a diskusní stránku autora, což je mnohdy praktičtější, než když tyhle údaje musí pak někdo dopátrávat prohledáváním historie stránky.
  • je obvyklé odpovídat na té diskusní stránce, na které byla diskuse započata. Tedy pokud tě někdo osloví na tvé diskusní stránce, odpovíš mu na stejném místě. Pokud někdo začne diskusi třeba na diskusní stránce obrázku nebo kategorie, i ostatní diskutují tam, atd. Pokud bys měl obavu, že by si mohl tvé odpovědi nevšimnout (třeba když odpovídáš až po dlouhé době), tak je lepší ho na jeho diskusní stránce upozornit, že už jsi mu na své diskusní stránce odpověděl, nežli pokračovat v diskusi jinde, než kde začala. --ŠJů (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

OK, vidím, že máš větší zkušenosti a vidíš víc dopředu. Myslím, že abecední řazení kategorií je vzhledem k celkové nedopracovanosti (ta asi bude existovat pořád) celkem maličkost. Mými úpravami se soubory a kategorie většinou posunuly jen nepatrně, zvláště pokud nejde o první písmeno v názvu. Končím se "spřežkami", někde se pokusím to dát i zpátky. A pokud myslíš, že v budoucnosti bude řešeno i řazení systémově, ustoupím i od vynechávání diakritiky. Taky díky za poznámky k mým diskusím a jejich editaci - jsem trochu počítačový analfabet, ale něco málo jsem schopný se ještě naučit. S pozdravem --palickap (talk) 08:44, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Nedopracované tu bude vždycky všechno, wiki projekty jsou ze své povahy vždycky živé a tedy vždycky rozpracované a vždycky se tu nějaké představy budou uchytávat, jiné ustupovat a jiné zase soupeřit. Je tu pár lidí, kteří jsou zastánci toho vynechávání diakritiky, s kýmsi takovým (už bych si nevzpomněl s kým) jsem podobný rozhovor vedl už před mnoha lety. Jejich řešení mě taky nijak nenadchlo, ale snažím se s nimi zbytečně nepřetahovat, i když já preferuji jiné řešení. Ty spřežky nejsou o tolik horší nápad, ale šlo mi hlavně o to, že když už se nám tu tlučou dva způsoby, tak už je zbytečnou komplikací přidávat k tomu třetí a to ještě poměrně dost neobvyklý. Samozřejmě žádná z těch variant nevadí nijak zásadně, ale když už se tím řazením zabýváš soustavně, tak možná stálo za to si o tom popovídat. Zdravím. --ŠJů (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Vlajky a znaky z REKOSuEdit

Dobrý den, kolego, prosím ukládejte z REKOSu soubory v původním rozměru – je potřeba náhled „rozkliknout“, aby se člověk dostal na větší verzi (u GIFových vlajek je to standardně 600 × 400 pixelů). Zdravím, Gumruch (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Kategorie ulicEdit

Ahoj, díky za třídění fotek z Kostelce nad Černými lesy. Mám drobnou technickou poznámku: pokud je název ulice nebo náměstí jedinečný (v žádné jiné obci stejný název nemají a nejmenuje se tak ani nic jiného než ulice), tak není třeba za název kategorie dávat rozlišovač s názvem obce. Zjistit se to dá ve většině internetových map poměrně snadno pomocí našeptávače ve vyhledávacím okénku, částečně se dá někdy i odhadnout. Ale chápu, že leckdo na to může mít názor opačný a radši by všechny tyto kategorie viděl s rozlišovačem, takže dávám k zamyšlení. --ŠJů (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Topolná, vlajka.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Topolná, vlajka.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jalubí, vlajka.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jalubí, vlajka.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | polski | română | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Palickap,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
  


العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Palickap,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
  

File:Zásmuky, Polákova.jpgEdit

 
File:Zásmuky, Polákova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 11:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
For the picture of the St.-Bartholomew-Church in Odry! Aarp65 (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


File:Buchtičky s krémem.jpgEdit

Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | sicilianu | Tiếng Việt | +/−

 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Buchtičky s krémem.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA) or   (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

UdálostiEdit

Dobrý den,

koukám do trackeru, že jste se čilý a chci nabídnout možnost zapojit se do focení Událostí. Máme jejich seznam v kalendáři.--Juandev (talk) 13:53, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj. Díky za důvěru. Zatím se zabývám převážně fotodokumentací českých obcí, okrajově např. chráněná území, něco ze zahraničí... Události z kalendáře stojí lehce mimo okruh mého zájmu. Na druhé straně zrovna divadlo a vážná hudba mezi mé koníčky patří, pohybuji se tam ale většinou bez foťáku. Výjimkou je pár interiérů divadel (nejnověji milánská La Scala), kongresové centrum ve Zlíně atd. Upřímně řečeno nevím, jak se na těchto akcích pohybovat s foťákem, navíc mi fotky interiérů nejdou moc technicky. Ježdění speciálně na nějaké akce by se zase nemuselo líbit manželce... Úplně to ale neodmítám. Jestli existují nějaká obecná pravidla focení událostí, případně odkazy na již nafocené akce, rád se na ně podívám. S pozdravem palickap (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Global accountEdit

Hi Palickap! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

SkořápovníkEdit

Ahoj, u tohoto bude problem, a totiz ze skorapovnik se nenachazi jen v Dolnich Kounicich, je to proste strom ozdobeny na Velikonoce. Viz [1] --Podzemnik (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Ahoj. I když jsem na to slovo natrefil dnes poprvé, teď tomu rozumím. Třídím teď kategorie měst a zakládám kategorie náměstí, v tomto případě Masarykovo nám. (DK). Toto mi tam nějak nevycházelo. Můj návrh: jen odebrat zařazení kategorie Skořápkovník pod Masarykovo nám. (DK). Všechny fotky pak dát primo k náměstí. Souhlasíš-li, udělám to. Zdravípalickap (talk) 22:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Treba, nebo vytvorit kategorii "Skorapovnik in Dolni Kounice", ale to necham na Tobe, nechtel jsem Ti do toho stourat, kdyz to vypada, ze na tom makas. Kazdopadne diky! --Podzemnik (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Náměstí v ČREdit

Dobrý den, názvy jako Benešovo squares in the Czech Republic, Dvořákovo squares in the Czech Republic či Tyršovo squares in the Czech Republic máte něčím podloženy? --Ragimiri 19:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Dobrý den, je to samozřejmě problematické. Názvy kategorií byly už před započetím mých editací nejednotné, takže vedle sporného Freedom squares a Comenius squares tu bylo např. i Mírové a Palackého squares. Druhá varianta se mi zdá přijatelná z toho hlediska, že tento název je uvedený v adresách a mapách. Pro případného nečeského uživatele je to tak srozumitelnější a těžko by hledal souvislost mezi pojmy Comenius a Komenského, případně Horní-Upper, Malé-Little (nebo small?), Mírové_peace, Jánské - John´s apod. A pro Čecha už by to bylo úplně nesmyslné, byť by uměl anglicky. Než jsem začal, přemýšlel jsem o tom a myslím, že z jazykového hlediska je toto nejlepší, i když ne ideální, neboť se tu kříží několik hledisek. Další můj argument-viz řazení kategorie Streets in the Czech Republic by name. Máte-li nějaké protiargumenty, rád si je pročtu.palickap (talk) 19:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Rozhodně bych použil první pád, např. Category:Karel Havlíček Borovský squares či Category:Edvard Beneš streets. --Ragimiri 21:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Souhlasím s tím, že by to vypadalo líp. Ale systémově už by to tak jasné nebylo. Ještě jednou odkazuji na podobnou kategorii Category:Streets in the Czech Republic by name, kde to v celém seznamu vypadá velmi přehledně a vůbec to není rušivé. Naopak kdyby se do toho rýpalo a udělalo třeba
 Dukelských hrdinů streets 
 Dusík streets 
 Dvorská streets 
 Dvořák streets 
 Dřevěná streets

byl by v tom zmatek. Ještě se dívám na seznamy jiných zemí. Tam jsou to jen velmi neúplné seznamy, ale hybridní názvy kategorií jsou běžné: 

Place de la République in France‎ 
Hlinku squares in Slovakia‎
Hodžovo squares in Slovakia (většinou takto, u seznamu ulic výlučně)
(ale nejednotné-také Štefánik squares...)
Bahnhof squares in Germany
(ale naproti tomu Peace squares in Germany)

Nedělám to proto, že bych to považoval za důležité, ale protože mě to baví a prohlížím si přitom fotky. Myslím, že by se vůbec nic nestalo, kdyby tyto kategorie vůbec neexistovaly (stačilo by dělení podle měst). Jestli víš o někom, kdo se podobnými "problémy" zabývá, zeptej se ho na to. Když vás bude víc, ustoupím. Zdravím.palickap (talk) 22:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Občas se také potýkám s problémem, jak zacházet s podobnými názvy. Obecně by mělo platit, že vlastní jména se nepřekládají, ani když bychom to teoreticky uměli, pokud není v angličtině pro daný objekt nějaké anglické pojmenování zažité (ostatně ne vždy musí být anglický název, existuje-li, překladem českého názvu). Einsteina také nepřevádíme na Onestonea. Už není středověk, aby se všechna vlastní jména důsledně překládala, dnes v době rejstříkové a počítačové naopak už mají více charakter identifikačního znakového řetězce než popisu či věnování (tím zatím zůstává například zasvěcení kostelů, které překládat můžeme). U jednotlivých pojmenovaných subjektů je lépe se obecným pojmům nad rámec vlastního jména vyhýbat a pro pojmenování použít pouze nepřeložené holé vlastní jméno objektu, s případným vlastním jménem sídla v závorce. Ale to je pro ty skupinové kategorie bohužel nepoužitelné. Překlad ovšem není způsobilý spolehlivě rozlišit synonymní názvy (např. ulici Přímou od ulice Rovné nebo Strmou od Příkré, asi by se našly i lepší příklady), natož umožnit její dohledání v mapě či registrech adres, a pokud se mění syntax, obtížně by anglický překlad podchytil rozdíl například mezi Masarykovou ulicí a ulicí T. G. Masaryka, popřípadě mezi ulicí Újezd a Újezdskou ulicí (což je dokonce dvojice, která se reálně nejméně v jednom městě vyskytuje souběžně). Čili vlastní jména až na naprosté výjimky nepřekládat, adjektivní vlastní jména ponechat v adjektivním tvaru, a kategorie by měly v první řadě seskupit ulice stejného názvu a teprve o kategorizační úroveň výš popřípadě seskupit stejné názvy podle toho, komu nebo čemu jsou věnovány, resp. od čeho jsou odvozeny. I když tedy zrovna u těch náměstí, která zmiňoval Ragimiri v úvodním příspěvku, bych hodně váhal a spíš bych volil rovnou anglicky pojmenovanou kategorii určenou společně pro náměstí Benešova, Edvarda Beneše i Dr. Beneše nebo Prezidenta Beneše apod. pro všechny varianty dohromady. --ŠJů (talk) 02:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Veselí nad Moravou, radnice.JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Veselí nad Moravou, radnice.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Campagne L'été des villesEdit

Bonjour, je vous invite de participer à la campagne L'été des villes en France. Des photo's télechargées entre le 21 juillet et le 21 septembre 2015 peut-on marquer avec la ligne 

{{L'été des villes}} [[Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles]]

ainsi elles compteront pour la campagne et seront montrées ICI . On peut également utiliser la uploadwizard de la campagne, qui ajoute cette ligne automatiquement. Amicalement.--Havang(nl) (talk) 09:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo,thank you. I will take part. I have some 13000 files at the Czech Wikipedia, but this was my first holliday in France.

Pavel Palička, Czech Republic. palickap (talk) 19:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


File:Gordes, Vasarely 01.JPGEdit

 
File:Gordes, Vasarely 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

The same applies to File:Gordes, Vasarely 02.JPG. JuTa 19:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Kroměříž, hřbitov, kaplička sv. Barbory.JPGEdit

 
File:Kroměříž, hřbitov, kaplička sv. Barbory.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Patka (talk) 07:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Popis kategoriíEdit

Zdravím. Díky za zakládání nových kategorií památek. Nezapomínejte prosím na stránce kategorie uvádět základní popis (pokud možno kompletní adresu a název objektu) a především šablonu s kódem památky, která pak usnadní vyhledání této kategorie pomocí odkazů a také poloautomatické doplnění odkazu na kategorii do příslušného seznamu památek. Většinou stačí tyto údaje jednoduše zkopírovat ze stránky některého obrázku, je-li šablonou opatřen. Díky. --ŠJů (talk) 02:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

PelhřimovEdit

Díky moc za to roztřídění fotek a přejmenování. Možná by jste si mohl požádat o práva přejmenovače a dělat to rovnou.--Juandev (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Já zas děkuju za zájem o mou činnost. Teď mě to chvilku bavilo a ten Pelhřimov se mi líbil, rád si přitom prohlížím cizí fotky. Ty vlastní ale třídím raději hned. Nevím co jsou práva přejmenovače.

palickap (talk) 09:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Je to oprávnění na základě, kterého můžete přejmenovávat soubory. Pravila jsou zde: Commons:File renaming. Žádost o práva se podává zde: Commons:Requests for rights#Filemover.--Juandev (talk) 10:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!Edit

 

Hi Palickap, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | español | 한국어 | മലയാളം | русский | українська | 中文（中国大陆）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 中文（台灣）‎ | +/− INeverCry 00:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jihlava, Masarykovo náměstí 58, horní síň, strop, svorník.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 13:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Omylem to skončilo na mé diskusní stránce.--Juandev (talk) 09:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Díky za nominaci. Jihlava byla pro mě celkově velmi milá a inspirativní. Velké povzbuzení do další práce, i když svou počítačovou gramotnost už zlepším jen stěží.

palickap (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

  1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Hidden recategorizationEdit

Hello. I would like to ask you to stop founding categories with names in Czech language like Category:Luisin pramen (Františkovy Lázně) and moving there all the files from the same topic categories with the English name like Category:Louise Spring. Firstly, it is against the Commons policy on the titles of categories, and secondly this is not the correct way of changing the names of categories. The correct process of renaming categories which have existed for a long time is described at Commons:Rename_a_category#Types of renames. For these reasons I am going to put the files back and if you do not agree, please follow the rules for controversial category renames. Thanks. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Soest, Paulistraße 16.JPGEdit

 
File:Soest, Paulistraße 16.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

91.38.62.5 06:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Two coordinatesEdit

Hi Palickap, for what are two coordiantes needed: [2]? --Arnd (talk) 06:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Just a mistake. I corrected it. Thank you for the reminding.
palickap (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

KocourovecEdit

Hi. Regarding this edit I want to point out that Kocourovec is a village, although it is a part of the municipality Přáslavice. Quoting from the English Wikipedia: "The territory over which a municipality has jurisdiction may encompass ... townships governing several villages". The municipality of Přáslavice governs two villages: Přáslavice and Kocourovec. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 23:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Corresponding Czech terms are obec (=municipality) and vesnice (=village). --Jan Kameníček (talk) 00:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

WLM 2017Edit

Zdravím, nahrali ste viacero súborov, ktoré by sa mohli zúčastniť súťaže Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. V prvé dni nefungovalo automatické pridávanie príslušnej šablóny {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2017|sk}} pri nahrávaní zo zoznamov na slovenskej wiki. Pri súboroch, kde mi bolo zrejmé, že ste ich nahrali zo zoznamov na slovenskej wikipédii som šablónu doplnil. Pri nasledujúcich, som šablónu nedoplnil, ak máte záujem, aby sa aj tieto fotky zúčastnili súťaže je potrebné túto šablónu ručne pridať.

Title Page ID Namespace Size (bytes) Last change User
File:Čičva (12).jpg 62152268 6 531 20170903184744 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (11).jpg 62152265 6 531 20170903184743 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (10).jpg 62152264 6 531 20170903184741 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (09).jpg 62152263 6 531 20170903184741 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (07).jpg 62152262 6 531 20170903184739 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (08).jpg 62152261 6 531 20170903184738 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (06).jpg 62152260 6 531 20170903184738 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (03).jpg 62152256 6 531 20170903184735 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (04).jpg 62152257 6 531 20170903184735 User:Palickap
File:Čičva (05).jpg 62152258 6 531 20170903184735 User:Palickap

--LacoR (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Díky za upozornění a pomoc. Wiki Loves Monuments jsem se několikrát zúčastnil a byl jsem některé roky dokonce nejvíc přispívajícím českým účastníkem. Česko se ale - nevím proč - už druhý rok nezúčastňuje. Ukládám fotky z dovolené na Slovensku, nějaké další ještě mám, a tak se ještě přidám. Ambice na nějakou výhru nemám, fotky jsou jen dokumentární, průměrné, ale snažím se vždy vyfotit ještě něco, co chybí. Zdravím na Slovensko. palickap (talk) 14:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Renaming filesEdit

Hi, please remember to fill in the reason fields. What is obvious to you might not be obvious to others. For example, I don’t see what’s the valid reason for File:포르투갈 신트라, 페냐성, by Nanshil Kwon - Flickr - cc.photoshare.jpg. Thanks. — regards, Revi 17:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

The same issue with File:2002 Cabo da Roca (37) (4307285134).jpg. Also, please do not rename files that are going to be deleted. --Didym (talk) 21:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Museo Teatrale alla Scala, Maria Callas.JPGEdit

català ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Museo Teatrale alla Scala, Maria Callas.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ☎ 08:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Uherské Hradiště, Billa.JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


File:Smraďavka, cesta ke kapli.JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

GPS souřadnice nesedíEdit

Dobrý den, probírám se fotografiemi z jižní Moravy, které jste nahrál na Commons, a teď konkrétně v Novosedlech jsem narazil na tuhle, která nemá správné GPS. Můžu se zeptat, jakého původu ty GPS souřadnice jsou? Zadával jste je ručně, nebo to dělal automaticky foťák? Pokud vám to nebude vadit, opravil bych to, ať souřadnice souhlasí se skutečným umístěním objektu. --GeXeS (talk) 09:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Dobrý den, správně jste poznal, že jde o ručně zadávané souřadnice. Je to už dost dávno, takže si tu geografickou situaci v Novosedlech moc nepamatuju. Pokud to tam znáte, tak samozřejmě opravte. Jinak jsem rád, že se na ty fotky díváte. S pozdravem palickap (talk) 11:07, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Rozumím, děkuji. Podívám se na to, až zase bude čas, ono to chvíli vezme. Nejsem přímo z Novosedel, jen z oblasti pocházím, tak jsem si vzal za cíl v tom udělat trochu pořádek. Opravuji prostým srovnáváním s panoramatickými pohledy z map Seznamu. --GeXeS (talk) 11:59, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabiliEdit

 
Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile Palickap, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Chválkovice (Olomouc), hotel Hanácký dvůr.JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Uherské Hradiště, Šromova (2).JPGEdit

Copyright status: File:Uherské Hradiště, Šromova (2).JPG

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Uherské Hradiště, Šromova (2).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 19:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bologna, MAMbo, Renato Guttuso-I funerali di Togliatti.jpgEdit

 
File:Bologna, MAMbo, Renato Guttuso-I funerali di Togliatti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Ruthven (msg) 17:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Hi, I have nominated the image of the sculpture "She Lies" which you have uploaded because I fear that it is a copyright violation. Yours sincerely, Spike Spike (talk) 22:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

PodhradíEdit

Ahoj, kdybys neměl na jaře co fotit, tak mám tip: objevil jsem článek cs:Podhradí (okres Zlín), kde se nachází jen fotka hradu kdesi v lesích, ze samotné vesnice nic. Takových případů v celém republice bude asi bohužel víc. Někdy loni jsem procházel Jihomoravský kraj, takže ten by měl být v tomto ohledu v pořádku, ostatní kraje jsem ale nekontroloval. --Harold (talk) 13:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Díky za upozornění. O Podhradí vím, ale v okolí je všechno celkem dobře zmapované, takže se mi nevyplácí tam vyjet jen na jeden objekt. Ale s nějakým rodinným výletem do Luhačovic by se to dalo pěkně spojit. Mimochodem, seznam nevyfocených vesnic je k dispozici, brzo by se-hlavně na Moravě- hodil nějaký seznam málo nebo špatně vyfocených. Srdečně zdravím palickap (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Ano, taky jsem si říkal, jak se bude postupovat, až budou všechny puntíky z mapy pryč... Ruční procházení kategorií a zapisování vesnic do seznamů je docela časově náročné, o jejich ručním udržování a nějaké pravidelné aktualizaci ani nemluvě. Já jsem rád, že jsem si prošel jeden okres, který jsem ale stejně už dlouho neaktualizoval. Vyhlídka do budoucna ohledně nějakých seznamů, obávám se, není moc pozitivní. :-) --Harold (talk) 18:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

HotCatEdit

Zdravím, kolego, děkuji za Vaši práci včetně kategorizace. Jen chci požádat o přidávání/měnění kategorií pomocí HotCat najednou – musí se kliknout na závorkované větší (++), pak se objeví tlačítko Uložit. Po přidání nebo změně více kategorií se toto tlačítko zmáčkne, načež se ještě objeví editační okno se změnami, takže je to jakoby o krok delší, ale zase se rekategorizace ukládá do historie jako jedna editace. A ještě jedna konkrétní editace – toto je asi chyba? S pozdravem Gumruch (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Pq. EdVIIEdit

Epá, atenção a isto: O monumento ao 25dA é só o mamarrachito com repuxo, no meio, do Cargaleiro. Os dois pares de colunas aos lado são mais antigos (anteriores a 1974, até) e homeangeiam outra coisa. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Filmový uzel Zlín, Karel Zeman, projekce.jpgEdit

 
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Filmový uzel Zlín, Karel Zeman, projekce.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 18:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
Za tu neúnavnou práci s kategoriemi a fotografiemi. Díky moc, Tvé práce si moc vážím! Z Nového Zélandu zdraví Podzemnik (talk) 01:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

palickap (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Velké díky za uznání a mnoho pozdravů k protinožcům (nebo od nás protinožců?)

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!Edit

English | Italiano | +/−

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Palickap,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)


File:Bratislava, 2016 European Figure Skating Championships-Ekaterina Stepanova, Dmitri Soloviev.JPGEdit

 
File:Bratislava, 2016 European Figure Skating Championships-Ekaterina Stepanova, Dmitri Soloviev.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

--Harmonia Amanda (talk) 10:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Palickap,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Krefeld, Carl-Wilhelm-Straße.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Krefeld, Carl-Wilhelm-Straße.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Krefeld, Carl-Wilhelm-Straße.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Palickap,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file moversEdit

 

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Dobrohošť součástí Dačic?Edit

Zdravím. Předpokládám, že toto byl nějaký omyl. Podle článku byla Dobrohošť součástí Dačic pouze v letech 1980–1990. --ŠJů (talk) 14:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Dobrý den. Díky za upozornění a opravu. Chybička se vloudí, I když se člověk snaží být pečlivý. palickap (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

ŠvihovEdit

Koukám, že si se dal do fotek ze Švihova a okolí. Velké díky za to, že to někdo upravuje!--Juandev (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Geraki TLG 19:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Geraki TLG 19:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hostětín - GPSEdit

Opožděné díky za fotky v Category:Hostětín!
Jen bych chtěl doplnit souřadnice k fotkám. Většinou je to zjevné a půjde to.

Jen u Hostětín, Kolelač (1).jpg

 

a Hostětín, Kolelač (2).jpg

 

si nejsu jistý.

Podle času jste to asi fotil tady:
1: 49.053375, 17.874634 maps.google.com
2: 49.052566, 17.876417 asi

Pamatujete si to ještě?--Glomerata (talk) 07:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Dobrý den, fotky doplňuju souřadnicemi jen občas. Nemám na to techniku a ručně je to dost zdlouhavé. Zkusím to u těchto dvou fotek, bude to ale asi jen přibližné. Vzpomínám si, že to bylo někde u železniční trati...

palickap (talk) 09:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Palickap&oldid=425957191"